-
Website
http://whitneyhess.com/blog -
Original page
http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/06/why-i-dont-have-an-iphone-but-might-someday/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
rorowe
4 comments · 2 points
-
sandieman
8 comments · 1 points
-
Dave Friedel
7 comments · 4 points
-
Matt J McDonald
5 comments · 1 points
-
Lisa Rex @lisarex
6 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
So you wanna be a user experience designer — Step 2: Guiding Principles
4 weeks ago · 9 comments
-
Take our Twitter survey for a chance to win a $200 Amazon gift card
2 weeks ago · 4 comments
-
So you wanna be a user experience designer — Step 2: Guiding Principles
I love my Iphone!
Treat yourself to a birthday gift. I can guarantee that you will love it too.
Maxine
In Washington, DC however, ATT's service is spotty and nonexistent in a lot of places, while VZ's is fantastic.
To Maxine, Abi and James, do any of you write long emails on your iPhone, or are you mostly talking about text messaging? I'd love to see a video of you typing on your iPhone one-handed while walking down the street. How accurate would it be? Do you have to go back to fix typos?
I'd also be curious to see two videos side-by-side of someone typing an email on an iPhone and typing the same on a BlackBerry. Which would get done first and be more accurate?
I never thought about your touchscreen keypad point before but I agree that it's an important factor in how you use your device.
Love posts that teach me new things/make me think differently! And that make tech stuff understandable for a non-techie like me :-).
One thing I want to add to the discussion is that your choice in mobile phone carrier is much more than just coverage. It is also their plans (pricing etc) and their customer service. I was with Sprint for many years before I switched to Verizon and the experience has been night and day different in these categories.
Interesting that the BlackBerry Thunder is all touchscreen. I wonder whether they are following the iPhone styling crowd just because they "have to".
But I will say that iPhone is a game changer, really in the sense that people have tried mine, think it's okay, then eventually buy one, and freak out with, "Why didn't you tell me to buy one right away." All for different reasons, email being one.
Really, I think what your post made me think about most of all was that maybe the blackberry and the iPhone are like Coke and Pepsi. They seem like competitors, but are more complementary. There are Coke drinkers, and there are Pepsi drinkers, but very few people who don't care whether they're served Coke or Pepsi.
Thanks again for a great thought-provoking post.
I do appreciate the detail of thought you put into it, but I am just as accurrate and fast on my iPhone as I was on my previous 3 smartphones (2 of which were BB's and the other a treo). The touchscreen while maybe diminishes in SOME areas, it doesn't diminish in any sort of experiential way what so ever. What's more is that the touch screen provides a level of UI you will never get in the same form factor on a phone that has a reasonably good QWERTY (screen size/resolution quality), etc.
I also think you are putting WAY too much on the importance of the keyboard. No one inputs more email and tweets than me from my iPhone. Heck, I've been known to write full IxDA posts from my iPhone that are several pages long. But the REAL advantages of the iPhone are the singularity. To ignore the convergence of the best in class mobile OS for phone, music, and internet and to put subjective keyboard and coverage on top of that is really missing the point of interaction design as a holistic experience.
Look at the customer stats regarding web browsing. 75% + of all mobile web browsing is done by iPhone users, despite the fact that iphone doesn't represent even 10% of all mobile browsing capable phones.
Why? b/c the total experience (despite slower speed mind you on the WAN) leads people to WANT to use the browser.
Ok, coverage. Maps are misleading and while yes, you drive around quite a bit (I have fun following your travels) where you communicate the most is in urban/suburban environments and I can attest from my own travels in cities big and small with my wife (Verizon customer) that there is NO, none, nada service differences in NYC, Long Island, Dallas, Chicago, Savannah, California, Seattle, London (oops!!! can't roam on Verizon nearly as easily on AT&T ... yea! GSM!!!) The differences in coverage and reliability between AT&T and Verizon and Sprint are marketing spillage and nothing more.
Now of course you are free to your end decision and opinion, but I think the reasoning you outline here are not as real as you think they are.
of course "taste" is an important consideration the reason we have options in capitalist worlds is that you can't make everyone happy with one option. Thank G-d!!!!
of course, there are some issues with AT&T connectivity, but only in remote areas. For the most part they have been pretty reliable.
When the 3 G comes out I'll be waiting in line.
Thanks again for the post
..The iPhone creates an amazing experience, it's pure delight.
BUT - Until the software for 2.0 is released it will remain a "cool phone", a Blackberry on the other hand is a BUSINESS phone.
It's really that simple. And even then - I NEED tactile feedback, I do way too much walking to have to stop or be looking up scared of hitting a tree (yes, I have done it thanks to my iPhone).
To end it here - you have a point, but you're missing out on saying "Look at my shiny phone!"
The keyboard is irritating, though. It's the primary reason I didn't rush out to buy the first gens when they came out. Now that Apple's unveiled the 3Gs, the keyboard is even more irritating because I'd allowed myself to buy into rumors of some sort of haptic solution to providing tactile feedback. Based on those and other rumors, Sunday night my wife and I were concocting plans and contingency plans to ensure we'd have ours come Monday. Instead, we got the feature list plus a month to weigh the iPhone and other options that will no doubt crop up in the interim. I'm likely going to join the masses, but not blissfully. I'll do it with the reluctance of a 5-year old eating Brussels sprouts. And over time, hopefully I'll learn to enjoy the iPhone; I did learn to enjoy Brussels sprouts.
(I'm not a BB fan either, btw. The only time I want a trackball control is when I'm playing Centipede.)
Just to clarify, you don't have to hold the iPhone w/one hand and type w/your index finger. I regularly thumb type with my iPhone all the time. Additionally, the text correction means that the few times I mistype a word, or misspell it, the iPhone is quick to make up for my shortcomings. I've rarely sent out an SMS w/a mistyped/misspelled word thanks to that. In fact, I send a couple hundred SMS messages a month and have probably sent out a handful that had something like IN when I meant to type ON.
To be fair, if you're a BB user, then it will probably take you a couple of days of regular use to get used to the touchscreen vs. actual physical raised buttons. My wife uses both — BB for work, iPhone for pleasure. She's not as fast as I am on the iPhone, but she's much better than when she started.
What I find ironic here is that everything I love about the iPhone is mirrored in Whitney's beautiful, intelligent, and so-well-designed blog post above.
Both are incredibly easy to read and navigate.
Both are very friendly.
Both have garnered a large user community quickly, and (seemingly) effortlessly.
Both have great UI.
Both have clean, colorful, and spacious design.
And both are incredibly successful.
I take off my virtual hat to both the iPhone AND Whitney Hess.
The synchronicity is, for me, the interesting part of this story.
And from a system design perspective, physical buttons can be looped into lower-level polling for key features like, oh, answering a phone call. I've seen my wife miss a call on her iPhone once because the phone didn't switch to the incoming call screen fast enough because of a system lag. Admittedly, I only saw this once. but it was very memorable because she was looking at the screen saying "let me answer the call damn it".
Anyway. The thing about coverage is it's all personal. What matters is where you are and where you go and your observations of signal strength when you're there. E.g., T-Mobile is crap in most of Park Slope (some spots with no signal at all) but now that I'm on AT&T I haven't had any problems. And that's NYC, a big solid splotch on both maps. Yeah, I wish it were simpler, too.
walking while texting/IMing/emailing on an iphone is dangerous, i won't even get into the extra danger of biking or driving while operating an iphone (duh). when we get to hang out, you'll see me dodge a trashcan or street sign at the last second if i'm trying to multitask.
having a device that you HAVE to look at to operate is frustrating as hell.
i've been concerned about tactile feedback on touchscreen devices since long before this time last year.
In fact, way back in 2007 Nokia released a device with a tactile touchscreen and Immersion has been doing great work tactile feedback touchscreens for awhile.
now the reason why i have an iphone is a long, long (and not expensive at all) story, and my complaints about at&t are worthy a blog post (or at least couple of paragraphs on Get Satisfaction) in itself.
It's a question of usage. I would rather have a larger screen that I can rotate as I wish than physical keys that must be held a certain way to use.
You write:
"Notice the difference in hand positions. On the iPhone, the user must
cradle the device in one hand and hit the keys with their index
finger. On the BlackBerry, the holds the device in both hands and can
type with their thumbs. Both hands are used equally on the BlackBerry,
while on the iPhone one hand is always used for typing while the other
is for holding — unless of course you switch back and forth, but that
would surely slow you down and get rather annoying."
But I don't know anyone with an iPhone who types like that! I always
hold my phone in one hand and type with the same hand--with my thumb,
no less. It's very convenient, and because of the width, easier than
doing the same on a Blackberry.
For someone in a creative profession you are not thinking about your
iPhone experience very creatively!
But thanks for the post. Keep up the great writing.
I also praise you for your brand loyalty to Verizon. It's a rare thing to hear about today.
This being said, I agree completely that the BlackBerry keypad is far better, and if typing a lot if important, the BlackBerry is still the way to go (and the way I go).
At first I as worried about ATT's 3G coverage in Minneapolis but their coverage map (http://www.wireless.att.com/coverageviewer/popU...) suggests I shouldn't be worried. We'll see.
I'll buy a new iPhone on 7/11. No doubt. Having owned BBs and Treos, I find the iPhone experience to be more intuitive and more functional. I agree with all the previous posts about your hand-position photos. I hold my iPhone like the photo of the BB. I type with both thumbs. It's not perfect, but then, neither was the BB or Treo. I think it boils down to personal style, not user interface design. Touchscreen on iPhone or exposed buttons on BB--both are top notch designs at this point.
Thanks for the insightful analysis, and inspiring such great comments.
Tim
@DavidMalouf: If only your assertion were true: but in NYC, AT&T doesn't work in many places that Verizon does. Much of Penn Station and the tunnels between NY and NJ, for instance. And since that's the place I most often need to make a call ("Hi, it's me. Trains are delayed again") AT&T is simply not an option.
What may be an option though, is something I posted about recently ( http://is.gd/T4a ) - people using two phones: a simple flip phone for calling and an iPhone or Blackberry for email/web. In addition to coverage issues, there are two other issues: flip phones feel more like phones, and separating the two lets you leave work at home while still being covered in emergencies.
As for web browsing numbers on iPhone, I wonder how much of that is due to the type of person who uses an iPhone vs the actual superiority of doing so.
Finally- as a long-winded Blackberry user, I'm also concerned about my speed and accuracy on an iPhone - I've played with them in the iTunes store, but that's a concern. The Scottish experiment sounds fascinating, btw.
"Only...audio cues"? There's a ton of research there too! (I'm prejudiced, it's what I did in grad school)... http://www.icad.org/
Join the party. Get an iPhone.
When iphone is open to other networks, or has a better variety of phone options that do not require touch screen, then I'll look at it.
Also I don't need tactile feedback. The reason is because as I'm mashing away on the touchscreen keypad I'm too busy already feeling something - how awesome I am for owning an iPhone.
You said:
"Notice the difference in hand positions. On the iPhone, the user must cradle the device in one hand and hit the keys with their index finger. On the BlackBerry, the holds the device in both hands and can type with their thumbs."
I always type with two hands on my iPhone, just like you picture of the BlackBerry.
Really glad you enjoyed the post, and I hope you find value out of the other
posts as well. Let's catch up soon!